Pro Tools Feedback Ideas

Studio One has pipe line

Reaper has REAINSERT

 

And they both ping for latency. Unfortunately PROTOOLS does inserts by correspondending / matching channels and it's not good for Universal Audio users.

We should not be limited to ten of each in 2017 and they should be freely draggable. I already have a feature request to allow a plug-in to be dragged in-between two contiguous plug-ins, not replace one!

I actually, really like how Harrison Mixbus has implemented inserts/sends where Insets and sends can be in any order but simply more than eight would be extremely beneficial to workflow

It would be great if you could move or copy a plug-in in-between two contiguous plug-ins.

At present, we only have the option to replace one of the plug-ins and it is time-consuming dragging plug-ins down first to create a empty insert slot.

When hovering in-between two plug-ins a highlighted line should inform the user the dragged plug-in will be inserted in-between these plug-ins.

Would it be an idea to assign a new plugin to a track in pro tools in the same way you open an application in OSX via spotlight.

Here's an example:
- Click on an empty insert
- Start writing the plugin's name. For example "EQ3..."
- Pro tools suggests "EQ3 1-Band" and "EQ3 7-band".
- If you continue writing "EQ3 7", Pro Tools would automatically insert the 7-band eq, because there are no other options left.

Hope you... more »

It would be nice to have a shortcut while dragging plugins around that would shuffle the order of plugins. This way the user can experiment with the plugin chain order.

Currently you select a plug-in by it's name or manufacturer. I would like to see the plug-in skin graphics in the list as thumbnails or outboard gear rack. Actually seeing the plug-ins would help decide what's might be more appropriate. Even a page of plug-in graphics to select from would be nice. Or a graphic of, say, a rack of various manufacturer's equalizers, limiters, reverbs to select from.
Please add your vote.... more »